Antarctica free essay sample

White fields of snow, surrounded by ice covered mountains and no civilization around for miles. This may sound like a fantasy land but is the blank canvas of Antarctica. Some people think of it as an arctic waste land but I see it as an unexplored frontier. Antarctica is one of last places on the planet that has not been thoroughly explored. It gives the land a kind of mystery; like anything could exist there. It represents an older simpler time in the world, before industrialization, automobiles, and roads. People have not breached this still natural and wild habitat. This natural world holds a magnificent beauty that is unparalleled anywhere else. It is one of the last uncultivated places left in the world where nature still reigns, free from the influence of human kind. Antarctica intrigues me because I am also interested in what is new and developing. This land has the opportunity to be created into anything. We will write a custom essay sample on Antarctica or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Any kind of government or economy; a whole new way of life could be created here. Any type of society could develop from a colonial government controlled by some world power or a new sovereign nation. The unknown ignites my imagination. It makes me ask the question what new advancement in technology can be found or scientific discoveries can be made? I am intrigued by the unknown and of all the places in the world Antarctica is the epitome of the unknown.

An Hour or Two Sacred to Sorrow Essays

An Hour or Two Sacred to Sorrow Essays An Hour or Two Sacred to Sorrow Essay An Hour or Two Sacred to Sorrow Essay In the essay. An Hour or Two Sacred to Sorrow. the author. Richard Steele. explains to the reader that many unexpected and unfortunate events may happen in our life-time ; nevertheless. those happenings should be looked back upon instead than bury. He writes from his ain experiences of loss. but continues to include the fact that it is acceptable even fulfilling to retrieve such events. The author begins by live overing the twenty-four hours his male parent died. At a mere age of five he remembers cognizing something was incorrect because no 1 would play with him. but no remembrance as to what was genuinely awry in the state of affairs. When he says. I†¦fell a-beating at the casket and naming Papa†¦ that statement along with. †¦ I know non how. I had some little thought that he was locked up in at that place. explains farther that he knew something was unsound about the state of affairs merely non precisely what it was. He so talks about how his female parent clutter s him out of her ain heartache. which struck his inherent aptitude of sorrow for his female parent. He so moves on to show the fact that when we’re older we obtain memory better than at a younger age ; in add-on. he explains that different memories cause different reactions in a individual. For case. when a individual passes off all you find yourself retrieving is their decease non the cheerful memories they left with you. He so elaborates this point by stating. †¦ gallant work forces. . cut off by the blade move instead our fear than our pity†¦ Stating this he points out that when a adult male from the military dies we are more respectful than sorry or upset by the incident. Many people would prefer non to retrieve the plaintive events of their lives. but instead the joyful experiences. In continuance he says that the first beauty he of all time beheld was in a virgin. He describes her as ignorantly capturing and heedlessly stand outing. which lead him to understand why decease should hold a right to her. but it still baffles him why decease besides seems drawn to the low and meek. He watches decease become an object of small value when he states. †¦ decease become the pretty trifler. He describes the virgins sudden decease and the torment he felt after hearing this intelligence. He so invites friends who had known her. and they began imbibing two bottles of wine apiece ; nevertheless. he finds that no affair how much he drinks it can non wipe out what had happened the dark before. Which gave them all the more ground to remember the impact she had left on their lives. In decision the author relives past blue experiences that stood out in his memory. In many ways life can be full of sorrow. but we must larn how to travel on from these events in our lives. on to better times. He explains that many unexpected and unfortunate events may happen in our life-time ; nevertheless. those happenings should be looked back upon instead than bury.

Sounds Analyses in a Sports Event Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words

Sounds Analyses in a Sports Event - Essay Example Sounds Analyses in a Sports Event It is said that one way music can be interpreted is through the listener’s â€Å"interaction† with it. Sound can be similarly interpreted this way, as sound is also perceived through the auditory sense . This idea can be linked some points in the field notes during the women’s tennis game between Duke University and Virginia Tech. For example, before the start of the game, the crowd could be heard chatting non-stop on probably every topic possible in casual conversations. As an observer, the sounds can be interpreted depending on the personal viewpoint of the listener or the â€Å"intention†. These sounds can be seen as sounds of excitement, of nervousness, or of indifference. To explain further, these three interpretations will be dissected. Sounds from the crowd can be interpreted as excitement due to the consistent rising and falling of the intonation of the overall chatter. They can also be interpreted as nervousness due to the listener’s percep tion of the circumstances where the sounds are happening. Rival fans can easily be perceived as nervous for the game results. Additionally, indifference may also be another interpretation due to the casual setting where the sounds are happening. However, this is just one aspect of interpretation. Another interpretation of sound can be based on â€Å"intentionality.† According to Tia De Nora, â€Å"users configure themselves as agents in and through the ways they relate to objects while they also configure objects in and through the ways they, as agents, behave towards those objects† ... De Nora, â€Å"users configure themselves as agents in and through the ways they relate to objects while they also configure objects in and through the ways they, as agents, behave towards those objects† (Guck 195). It happens, for instance, when the listener uses the music as a catalyst to what the listener wants to feel. For example, during the event, if the listener wants to feel excitement, they can easily use the sounds around them as a catalyst to feel excitement. The endless, mixed sound of voices can easily be used as an accomplice to get this feeling. On the other hand, if the listener wants to feel that their preferred team or player is at an advantage, they could choose to interpret the sounds from rival fans as nervousness (Guck 195-7). Semantics and Pragmatics In communication, aside from phonetics, lexicon, grammar, and syntax, pragmatics, and semantics are also necessary (Feld 206-7). Similarly, rules beyond how a music or sound is made are considered in interpr eting music or sound. Meanings and conceptions of self are equally important in interpreting the objects a listener hears. This could mean that sounds cannot be interpreted solely on the basis of its structure while isolating the context where it is heard. While not absolutely similar, it is reasonable to point out that some issue in linguistics may be applied in ethnomusicology (Feld 207). For example, in the same sports event, if a listener focuses on the social structure where sounds are produced, any listener will interpret the sounds in similar fashion. However, if the pragmatic and semantic theories are applied, a simple sound of laughter from a group of people may present different meanings to the listener. This does not discuss yet the â€Å"intentional† meaning that the producers of the

Summary Movie Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 1

Summary - Movie Review Example The main problem that gave rise to such a thing was the use of a deputy (by the sheriff investigating the case) to translate what a witness to the crime said. The translator was used because Cortez could not speak in Spanish. The worst part was that the translator himself could not speak Spanish accurately-his inability to distinguish in Spanish between a caballo (horse) and a yegua (mare) leads to the sheriff believing Cortez to be the horse-thief. When the sheriff goes after him with a gun, Cortez rightfully fights back for his life-in the current century, this act of his would be called self-defense. His brother gets shot and killed in this process in the mayhem. Cortez accidentally shoots at the sheriff, killing him. Soon after this occurs, Cortez takes off on horseback and heads for the Mexican border. He is pursued by sheriffs, the renowned Texas Rangers and possess across Texas, all of whom were unable to catch the ‘fugitive’. The longer it takes for them to capture him, the more he is depicted as a hero by the press. Even though he steered cleared of the several traps that his capturers set for him, he eventually turned himself in when he found out that his family had been arrested by the authorities and kept as prisoners. The manhunt lasted for about eleven days. This whole incident results in the devastation of a family and the killing of an innocent man. The Ballad of Gregorio Cortez is an amazing representation by director Robert M. Young of the injustice that Mexican-American workers and citizens in the Southwest suffered at the hands of the Texas Rangers. The director has effectively used the techniques of flashbacks to show the different accounts of what happened. Moreover, it is a bit intriguing to find out the real character of Gregorio Cortez. This is because his role in the story keeps changing from time to time- it all depends on who is telling the story. There is, however, one

Hitler and Nationlism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Hitler and Nationlism - Essay Example In addition, the extremist approach to establishing superiority of Germany in Europe facilitated the interest of conquering the entire Europe under the nation. Irrationality in pursuing national goals is another element of nationalism that aided Hitler’s application of the nationalism doctrine to facilitate his objectives. Even though some significant forces disagreed with, they still supported his initiatives based on the notion that Hitler was the best person to spearhead the nation’s interest. Nationalism blinded the forces from their individual philosophies and from the wrongs of Hitler’s goals. Revolutionary aspects of nationalism also facilitated Hitler’s objective by earning him loyalty from forces. Having suffered from conditions of the Treaty of Versailles and depression, Germans were united in rejecting then Reichstag and the revolutionary force gathered support for Hitler’s goals of a more superior Germany (Snyder, 2003; Daniel & Kanarek,

Introduction To Gay Marriage English Language Essay

Introduction To Gay Marriage English Language Essay The society today tends to stick to what they know and hold on to the familiar. Therefore when something unfamiliar comes along the society resists acceptance, instead they dismiss the issue by denying its existence. Unfortunately, gay marriage is one of the issues that the society has come to refuse to accept and deal with. Maybe, it is because they do not know how to approach it or maybe the issue just took them by surprise and they just need a moment to recover. For whatever reason, the society has chosen to ban gay marriage in Palau. Same sex marriage is new to us all, I completely understand that fact. It was not until recently that we found out that there are certain people that are into liking the same sex. However if we come to think of it, many things regarding marriage, has all, at one point in life, been new to us. In fact when I asked my grandfather, whose name is Kanai Edesomel, what traditional marriage was like back in the old days he said that marriage, traditionally, was mostly arranged. My grandfather went on to say that children back then did not have a say in who they were going to marry. The parents were the ones that chose who their children was going to marry based on a persons character, family background, and how the marriage is going to benefit their own family. Based on what my grandfather told me about marriage in the old days and how marriage is today, I would have to say that Palau has come a long way from arranged marriage. In an article published in the New York Times, William Saletan pointed out how we, members of the society, dont realize how marriage has continuously changed over time, usually in ways so congenial. In the same article William Saletan noted that not only is change part of the tradition but tradition will be part of the change.(Saletan) We, Palauans have slowly broke away from our traditional way in marriage, because whether we realize it or not the world we live in today demands change from us. We are becoming diversely knowledgeable therefore we have to adjust traditions to match the world we live in today and the knowledge we have; and if not adjust traditions we shall make new traditions. In being able to adjust and come up with new traditions we shall become more accepting of same sex marriage. This is all your opinion-not research. We have to stop and consider people in our society who are gay, they are not doing anything wrong; they are just being who they are. Gay cannot help the way they feel. During the 1990s a scientist named Laura S. Allen did an experiment on the human brain. For her experiment, Laura compared the brain of heterosexuals and homosexuals. She came to find that that the hypothalamus, which is the part of the brain that is connected to the sexual drive and function, for homosexuals are bigger that hypothalamus for heterosexual. (Biological Basis for Homosexuality) Therefore, I can say, based on Allens experiment results, that gay people do not choose to be gay; they are born gay. The society should not deny gay people marriage because they think that gay people choose to be this way. I asked a couple of Palauans who are against gay marriag, why they chose to be against it? Most of them said that they think that being gay is not right and people that are gay are sinner. That is why I say that gay people does not choose to be gay, they are born this way. Another study that was done on homosexuals to determine whether they were born gay or not, that is quite similar to Laura Allens experiment also came up with the similar results as Laura Allens experiment. The experiment I am talking about is by Simon LaVay, who also studies both homosexuals and heterosexual brains and compared them.(Biological Basis of Homosexuality) Although, the overall study on whether people are born gay or choose to be gay is inconclusive, there are been evidence shown that gay people were born the way they are, just like experiments I have told you about. We can never know for sure if gay people were born this way or chose the path that they are on. However, if you think about it, no one in their right minds would choose an identity that is descriminated and hated by the society. Now that I have mentioned descrimination let me just tell you that by denying gay people marriage we are descriminating gay people. We are always enforcing equality in our society, and yet we are not treating gay people equally by not allowing them to marry and receive the benefits that any traditional couple will receive when they marry. In the constitution of the Republic of Palau under Article 4, section five it clearly says, Every person shall be equal under the law and shall be entitled to equal protection. The government shall take no action to discriminate against any person on the basis of sex, race, place of origin, language, religion or belief, social status or clan affiliation except for the preferential treatment of citizens, for the protection of minors, elderly, indigent, physically or mentally handicapped, and other similar groups, and in matters concerning intestate succession and domestic relations. No person shall be treated unfairly in legislative or executive inve stigations.(Constitution of the Republic of Palau.1979) By denying gay people marriage we are descriminating against peoples race and believes, if that does not go against the constitution I do not know what does. I all comes down to morality, what do we think is right to do? While deciding we shall consider the changes in marriage throughout the years. At the same time consider that gay people cannot change who they are, just like we cannot change who we are; in changing who we are we are denying ourselves. Also we have to consider the laws that have been set out for our society. Work Cited: Saletan,William The Peculiar Institution.Sunday Book Review(2004):3.The New York Times.Web.26 September 2004. Biological Basis for Homosexuality..Biobasis(2003):7151.Geocities.Web.8 April 2003. The Constitution of the Republic of Palau.Palau Consolidated Lagilation.(1998):Paclii.Web.2 April 1979. Research Evaluation Thoroughness of Research: 4 Extremely thorough, strong thesis supported by research, paper has purpose and not just facts, variety of sources 3 research good overall but some areas need additional research, thesis and research mostly support each other, purpose to research (not just facts) three types of sources 2 Basic research is good, paper has thesis but weak, more facts than purpose, additional research to support thesis needed throughout, two sources used 1 Research is insufficient throughout, very weak or missing thesis, paper mostly facts, insufficient sources Structure and Organization: 4 Information is extremely well organized and easy to understand, correct person used throughout the paper, appropriate transitions used so paragraphs blend together 3 Organization is generally good but some information is misplaced, some error in person, some use of transitions so paragraphs somewhat blend 2 Organization falls apart in several areas but the basic structure of the paper is good, multiple errors in person, few transitions so paper reads fairly choppy 1 Overall structure of the paper is not well thought out causing paper to be unorganized, many errors in person, insufficient or no transitions results in paragraphs not connecting causing choppy reading Development: 4 Excellent introduction with proper thesis placement, each point is clearly identified and explained, strong conclusion which restates purpose, points and has closure 3 Good introduction with proper thesis placement, most points are clearly identified and explained, good conclusion which summarizes and has closure 2 fair introduction which contains thesis, some points are thoroughly explained, while others need development, fair conclusion 1 Weak introduction, most or all points still need a lot of development, poor conclusion causing paper to end abruptly Originality of Voice: 4 Research material has been thoroughly incorporated into the writers own words 3 Most of the paper reflects the tone of the writer 2 A great part of the research material still reflects the tone and style of the original source 1 The research paper reads as if most of it were simply copied from original texts (PLAGIARISM) Citations: 4 Writer has made citations in all areas where they quoted, paraphrased or summarized and effectively sandwiched in 3 Citations were made and sandwiched in effectively for most quotations, paraphrases and summaries, 2 Some citations were made and some attempt to sandwich in 1 No citations were made at all or citations do not fit into original writing Grammar, Mechanics and Spelling: 4 Writer showed care in proofreading; only occasional errors occur 3 Errors are common 2 Paper has multiple errors in every paragraph; sometimes the errors make the paper hard to understand 1 Paper has many errors, making it very difficult to read and understand Works Cited page: title, alphabetized, correct indentation, resources correctly formatted, sufficient number of resources listed, correctly punctuated (4 to 1 points) Format: Format: font size and style correct, 1 inch margins, right side ragged (no justification), title page correctly formatted, paper double spaced, paragraphs indented, reference page correctly titled and formatted, header with last name and page number on top right. (4 to 1 points) Overall Total: *32-29 (A range) Excellent work; well written *28-21 (B range) good; yet additional polish is needed 32=A *20-13 (C range) Fair; effort still needs to be done to finish the 24=B research paper 16=C *12-05 (D range) Poor; all areas of the research paper still need a 8=D lot of work; 4=F *04- 0 (F range) unacceptable; poor attention to rough draft comments, still lacking sufficient research The paper should be mostly written in third person. Only when you discuss personal issues, would you use the first person pronoun. The use of we throughout the paper needs to be changed. Use third person and use nouns more than pronouns. In addition, you have not punctuated the in-text citation properly. Note where the period goes. Your resource page is not correctly formatted either. You also have to be careful not to write your opinion so much. Back up what you say with research.

Cannery Row :: essays research papers

The Pearl of Cannery Row   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  A pearl is created when a tiny speck of intruding dust enters and irritates an oyster shell. The reaction of the oyster is to make a beautiful pearl out of the particle of dust. Some pearls are perfect and others are imperfect, but all are a unique and wondrous creation of nature. In Cannery Row, John Steinbeck imitates nature’s process with Cannery Row as the oyster and Mack as the speck of dust. Steinbeck shows Mack as the irritant which causes Cannery Row to veer from a precarious course and make a change for the better. In the end Mack creates a wonderful â€Å"pearl† for Cannery Row — the quality of unity — and the reader learns that sometimes the best results come from seemingly meaningless occurrences.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   Mack is in the least a large source of irritation and at the most worthless to the residents of Cannery Row. Steinbeck introduces him as â€Å"... the elder, leader, mentor and to a small extent, the exploiter of a little group of men who had in common no families, no money and no ambitions beyond food, drink and contentment† (9). His effect upon the town, while often anonymous, is clearly sensed: â€Å"A hardware store supplied a can of red paint not reluctantly because it never knew about it...† (12). Mack appears when he needs something and disappears when pay-up time comes around. To Cannery Row, â€Å"Mack [and the boys] avoid the trap, walk around the poison, step over the noose while a generation of trapped, poisoned and trussed-up men scream at them and call them no-goods, come-to-bad-ends, blots-on-the-town, thieves, rascals, bums† (15). Because Mack does not fit society’s traditional standards of living, the town also assumes that his character does not measure up either. He isn’t seen for what he really is — a man with a sweet soul who simply is not driven by worldly desires — instead, people judge him against others and by their own expectations of a man.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Mack lacks ambition but not a good heart. His only intentions are for survival, never for the purpose of inflicting pain or problem on others: â€Å"In the world ruled by tigers with ulcers, rutted by strictured bulls, scavenged by blind jackals, Mack [and the boys] dine delicately with the tigers, fondle the frantic heifers, and wrap up the crumbs to feed the sea gulls of Cannery Row† (15).